Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ross Jolliffe's avatar

Mmm, I applaud this experiment, but if you were not prepared to stick with a naturally regenerative area, why include one in the exercise? No doubt there were pressures to change track, tidy-up the scrub or something but this is a bit of a lost opportunity (although I do not know what timescale was set for establishment). No matter: there are examples of natural regeneration all around us to view on abandoned marginal agricultural land, industrial sites etc. and documented examples* The aesthetic problem is initial disorder and unsightliness - as typically, brambles hold fast to litter... A second problem is that without some knowledge of what is going on, natural regeneration can look to be rather dull collections of what remains of local species after thousands of years of modification by man - and a few by muntjac. The process of truly original natural regeneration is now impossible owing to flora and fauna communities change and/or species elimination, would take a very long time indeed, and never be finished. There is a very, very strong case for intervention on the railway.

*Read about the Monks Wood Experiment: https://theconversation.com/monks-wood-wilderness-60-years-ago-scientists-let-a-farm-field-rewild-heres-what-happened-163406

https://www.ceh.ac.uk/our-science/projects/assist-monks-wood-rewilding

No posts

Ready for more?